The WHO bows to radical transgender ideology, says ‘sex is not limited to male or female’
The scandal-plagued UN agency also promoted the notion that 'gender identity exists on a continuum.
(LifeSiteNews) – It was only a matter of time: The World Health Organization (WHO) announced on July 6 that it is now “updating” its manual on “gender mainstreaming.” The WHO posted the announcement to its website:
The Gender mainstreaming for health managers: a practical approach manual addresses how gender norms, roles and relations affect health-related behaviours and outcomes as well as health sector responses. At the same time, it recognizes that gender inequality is a cross-cutting determinant of health that operates in conjunction with other forms of discrimination based on factors such as age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity or place of origin and sexual orientation. The manual provides a basis for addressing other forms of health-related discrimination.
The first edition of the manual dates from 2011, and WHO is now updating it in light of new scientific evidence
and conceptual progress on gender, health and development
The review and update process will build on the extensive work already featured in the manual. It will focus on:
Of course, the WHO is responding not to science but to politics, specifically, the politics in the richest member countries of the United Nations. The conversion of the elite in a couple of countries to gender theory is now being presented as scientific fact to the entire global community, with Marxist frameworks explicitly baked in. As C-Fam put it in its analysis of the announcement:
To the extent that these matters are political rather than scientific or medical, they arise from political processes that are outside the democratic and consensus-based structure that produced the UN’s foundational documents through negotiation in the General Assembly and other bodies. Rather, they originate in the work of activist groups and largely unaccountable human rights experts that often share close ties with these groups, all of which are funded by a minority of wealthy donor countries and billionaire philanthropists.
The reason this is a significant development is that, as you’ll recall, the WHO’s word is infallible for many of the same people who make decisions surrounding public health, including during pandemics. These folks are considered to be the “experts” informing the world of what “the science” says at any given time, and in a globalized world, their influence is enormous —especially as terrified politicians outsource their decision-making to global health authorities in order to avoid making difficult decisions themselves.
The WHO claims that it is still “following the science,” and that this “science” has told us that there are more genders than male and female. Naturally, this will be interpreted as a tacit endorsement of puberty blockers for kids, “sex change” surgeries for minors, and the rest of the horror show unfolding in a dozen Western countries at the moment. If these are the experts we’re following, we should all be horrified.
The Gender mainstreaming for health managers: a practical approach manual addresses how gender norms, roles and relations affect health-related behaviours and outcomes as well as health sector responses. At the same time, it recognizes that gender inequality is a cross-cutting determinant of health that operates in conjunction with other forms of discrimination based on factors such as age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity or place of origin and sexual orientation. The manual provides a basis for addressing other forms of health-related discrimination.
The first edition of the manual dates from 2011, and WHO is now updating it in light of new scientific evidence
and conceptual progress on gender, health and development
The review and update process will build on the extensive work already featured in the manual. It will focus on:
- Updating key concepts around gender;
- Highlighting and expanding on the concept of intersectionality, which looks at how gender power dynamics interact with other hierarchies of privilege or disadvantage, resulting in inequality and differential health outcomes for different people. Intersecting factors include sex, ethnicity, race, age, class, socioeconomic status, religion, language, geographical location, disability status, migration status, gender identity and expression, sexual orientation and political situation.
- Going beyond binary approaches to gender and health to recognize gender and sexual diversity, or the concepts that gender identity exists on a continuum and that sex is not limited to male or female.
- Introducing new gender, equity and human rights frameworks and tools to further support capacity building around these concepts and the integration of their approaches in the work of WHO.
Of course, the WHO is responding not to science but to politics, specifically, the politics in the richest member countries of the United Nations. The conversion of the elite in a couple of countries to gender theory is now being presented as scientific fact to the entire global community, with Marxist frameworks explicitly baked in. As C-Fam put it in its analysis of the announcement:
To the extent that these matters are political rather than scientific or medical, they arise from political processes that are outside the democratic and consensus-based structure that produced the UN’s foundational documents through negotiation in the General Assembly and other bodies. Rather, they originate in the work of activist groups and largely unaccountable human rights experts that often share close ties with these groups, all of which are funded by a minority of wealthy donor countries and billionaire philanthropists.
The reason this is a significant development is that, as you’ll recall, the WHO’s word is infallible for many of the same people who make decisions surrounding public health, including during pandemics. These folks are considered to be the “experts” informing the world of what “the science” says at any given time, and in a globalized world, their influence is enormous —especially as terrified politicians outsource their decision-making to global health authorities in order to avoid making difficult decisions themselves.
The WHO claims that it is still “following the science,” and that this “science” has told us that there are more genders than male and female. Naturally, this will be interpreted as a tacit endorsement of puberty blockers for kids, “sex change” surgeries for minors, and the rest of the horror show unfolding in a dozen Western countries at the moment. If these are the experts we’re following, we should all be horrified.
LIFE SITE
Jonathan
Van
Maren
The WHO bows to radical transgender ideology, says ‘sex is not limited to male or female’ - LifeSite (www-lifesitenews-com.translate.goog)
Jonathan
Van
Maren
The WHO bows to radical transgender ideology, says ‘sex is not limited to male or female’ - LifeSite (www-lifesitenews-com.translate.goog)