The deep sexual state
By Jennifer Roback Morse ( Ruth Institute - first published in the American Mind ) - Translated by Quebec-Life Campaign - Image (montage by AH): AdobeStock
The Sexual Revolution was not about freedom,
but control.America is no longer governed by the constitution as it was understood by our founders. On the contrary, we are governed by a set of unelected and accountable administrative agencies. Readers of this site may be familiar with the concept of Administrative State and Deep State .
The deep state goes beyond bureaucracy, including other non-governmental social structures that support, promote and protect it in various ways. The media, the academic world, the entertainment industry, businesses, charities and even professional athletes have created a uniform structure that limits people's behavior and thinking. The Deep State is an omnipresent, persuasive, powerful and largely hidden presence.
In this article, I build on these concepts and propose the addition of the concept of the sexual state . This sexual regime in which we live shares the main characteristics of the deep state and counts on and supports the administrative state. This claim has immense personal and political repercussions.
but control.America is no longer governed by the constitution as it was understood by our founders. On the contrary, we are governed by a set of unelected and accountable administrative agencies. Readers of this site may be familiar with the concept of Administrative State and Deep State .
The deep state goes beyond bureaucracy, including other non-governmental social structures that support, promote and protect it in various ways. The media, the academic world, the entertainment industry, businesses, charities and even professional athletes have created a uniform structure that limits people's behavior and thinking. The Deep State is an omnipresent, persuasive, powerful and largely hidden presence.
In this article, I build on these concepts and propose the addition of the concept of the sexual state . This sexual regime in which we live shares the main characteristics of the deep state and counts on and supports the administrative state. This claim has immense personal and political repercussions.
The sexual state
Despite appearances, the Sexual Revolution in no way encouraged individual freedom. On the contrary, cultural elites have requisitioned the power of the state in order to implement their utopian social and sexual vision. The Sexual Revolution serves the interests of this ruling ruling class. The Sexual Revolution is not the result of a surge of spontaneous "cultural changes" or of the inexorable "march of history".
To illustrate this point well, we must consider this Sexual Revolution as being the question of the day: inventing and securing the rights of this so-called transgender person. Boys identifying themselves as girls should have the right to participate in women's athletic competitions , public libraries should accommodate transvestites to read stories to children , men identifying themselves as women should be admitted to women's shelters victims of violence and must be able to be imprisoned in women's prisons. No serious person can argue that ordinary people naturally demand these policies,
each more bizarre than the next.
Although some are True Followers and are motivated by their abstract ideological commitments, for the most part, they are elites who instill these ideas in the public, in view of their ideological, financial and personal interests, in order to satisfy their desires for power. gross.
For example, pharmaceutical companies find a financial interest in transgender ideology. Individuals who attempt to live as members of the opposite sex will need medical care such as expensive medications and hormone substitutes for their entire lives.
Despite appearances, the Sexual Revolution in no way encouraged individual freedom. On the contrary, cultural elites have requisitioned the power of the state in order to implement their utopian social and sexual vision. The Sexual Revolution serves the interests of this ruling ruling class. The Sexual Revolution is not the result of a surge of spontaneous "cultural changes" or of the inexorable "march of history".
To illustrate this point well, we must consider this Sexual Revolution as being the question of the day: inventing and securing the rights of this so-called transgender person. Boys identifying themselves as girls should have the right to participate in women's athletic competitions , public libraries should accommodate transvestites to read stories to children , men identifying themselves as women should be admitted to women's shelters victims of violence and must be able to be imprisoned in women's prisons. No serious person can argue that ordinary people naturally demand these policies,
each more bizarre than the next.
Although some are True Followers and are motivated by their abstract ideological commitments, for the most part, they are elites who instill these ideas in the public, in view of their ideological, financial and personal interests, in order to satisfy their desires for power. gross.
For example, pharmaceutical companies find a financial interest in transgender ideology. Individuals who attempt to live as members of the opposite sex will need medical care such as expensive medications and hormone substitutes for their entire lives.
Applicants of the use of “politically correct” pronouns will need an incessant growth of cultural and legal power. These censors are not found only among government officials. The arbiters of the tastes and opinions of the people will see their status increase. They can create new standards of behavior, invent new offenses (called “micro-assaults”) and create pressure packs on Twitter to attack transgressors. There is no doubt that many of them are savoring this influx of power by using this empire of social sanction to inflict harm on others.
Like Bolsheviks, True Adepts of the Sexual Revolution have given their lives to this irrational ideology which has no chance of working, if by "working" we mean the implementation of their plans accompanied by the halting of destruction of what's left of our society. But their irrational illusions do not deter them. They convince themselves that the nobility of their objectives justifies anything and everything, and only believe that they need more raw government power and the manipulative power of propaganda to succeed.
Like Bolsheviks, True Adepts of the Sexual Revolution have given their lives to this irrational ideology which has no chance of working, if by "working" we mean the implementation of their plans accompanied by the halting of destruction of what's left of our society. But their irrational illusions do not deter them. They convince themselves that the nobility of their objectives justifies anything and everything, and only believe that they need more raw government power and the manipulative power of propaganda to succeed.
The sexual revolution precisely
The ideology of the Sexual Revolution can be broken down into three elements.
1. The first element for a "good" and "decent" "progressive" society is to separate the concept of sex from that of conception.
Contraceptive methods must not only be legally available, but also subsidized and actively encouraged. Certainly, abortion on demand should remain available as a second resort in the event that contraception fails. I will call this the contraceptive ideology .
2. The second element is that a "good" society must separate both sex and offspring from marriage.
A person does not need to be married before having sex or having a child. Behind this hides the deeper idea that children don't really need both parents because they are resilient. Children can survive many changes in the parents' sex life or lifestyle. In fact, children can benefit because after all,
happy parents make happy children. I will call this the ideology of divorce .
3. The last element states that a “good” society will try to destroy the significance of the differences between men and women.
Certain types of feminism have paved the way for this ideology. Feminism, in its original form, claimed that the differences between men and women are socially constructed and are almost certain proof of injustice. Ideology has mutated into transgenderism, which claims that technology and social engineering can replace the sex of the body. In both cases, the sex is insufficiently significant and can be replaced at the desired time.
I will call this the gender ideology .
We could even say that the defining characteristic of the Sexual Revolution rests on the idea that the human
will can prevail over the physical realities of sex and reproduction .
This ideology argues that not only can we erase sex, but that we can also build a society where intercourse is sterile. A society where procreation is independent of sexual relations is the default prototype. Reproduction would occur according to the parents' wishes and when they see fit. The ideology of divorce insists that we can get around the most basic need for attachment between the child and the mother or father. We try so hard to convince ourselves and our children that this biological link between us is of no importance.
This claim of human will against nature is the first significant coincidence between the administrative state and the Sexual Revolution.
John Marini, a senior member of the Claremont Institute, says that this shift from reason and natural law to that of raw will in the political class is the very character of the blurring of the constitutional government and the current regime governed by administrative agencies. Marini contends that the technocratic elite regime began with Woodrow Wilson in the "Progressive Era" and was fully realized with the Great Society of Lyndon Johnson. Congress sets out an idea and gives the bureaucracy the task of implementing it.
The natural reaction movements that could correct his crazy and unreasonable goals don't work. Normal people subject to the administrative state cannot get rid of it by voting, as would be possible under a constitutional regime, nor can they invest their money elsewhere such as in a market system. Whether the government's vision is reasonable or not, or whether it is chosen by the people or not, the bureaucracy takes its course.
Let's analyze some concrete examples of the sexual state in action to see if it corresponds to Marini's analysis.
The ideology of the Sexual Revolution can be broken down into three elements.
1. The first element for a "good" and "decent" "progressive" society is to separate the concept of sex from that of conception.
Contraceptive methods must not only be legally available, but also subsidized and actively encouraged. Certainly, abortion on demand should remain available as a second resort in the event that contraception fails. I will call this the contraceptive ideology .
2. The second element is that a "good" society must separate both sex and offspring from marriage.
A person does not need to be married before having sex or having a child. Behind this hides the deeper idea that children don't really need both parents because they are resilient. Children can survive many changes in the parents' sex life or lifestyle. In fact, children can benefit because after all,
happy parents make happy children. I will call this the ideology of divorce .
3. The last element states that a “good” society will try to destroy the significance of the differences between men and women.
Certain types of feminism have paved the way for this ideology. Feminism, in its original form, claimed that the differences between men and women are socially constructed and are almost certain proof of injustice. Ideology has mutated into transgenderism, which claims that technology and social engineering can replace the sex of the body. In both cases, the sex is insufficiently significant and can be replaced at the desired time.
I will call this the gender ideology .
We could even say that the defining characteristic of the Sexual Revolution rests on the idea that the human
will can prevail over the physical realities of sex and reproduction .
This ideology argues that not only can we erase sex, but that we can also build a society where intercourse is sterile. A society where procreation is independent of sexual relations is the default prototype. Reproduction would occur according to the parents' wishes and when they see fit. The ideology of divorce insists that we can get around the most basic need for attachment between the child and the mother or father. We try so hard to convince ourselves and our children that this biological link between us is of no importance.
This claim of human will against nature is the first significant coincidence between the administrative state and the Sexual Revolution.
John Marini, a senior member of the Claremont Institute, says that this shift from reason and natural law to that of raw will in the political class is the very character of the blurring of the constitutional government and the current regime governed by administrative agencies. Marini contends that the technocratic elite regime began with Woodrow Wilson in the "Progressive Era" and was fully realized with the Great Society of Lyndon Johnson. Congress sets out an idea and gives the bureaucracy the task of implementing it.
The natural reaction movements that could correct his crazy and unreasonable goals don't work. Normal people subject to the administrative state cannot get rid of it by voting, as would be possible under a constitutional regime, nor can they invest their money elsewhere such as in a market system. Whether the government's vision is reasonable or not, or whether it is chosen by the people or not, the bureaucracy takes its course.
Let's analyze some concrete examples of the sexual state in action to see if it corresponds to Marini's analysis.
The deep sexual state at work
#SaveJames: James Younger and the anarchy of family courts.
A divorced father living in Texas wants to raise his two sons as a boy. The mother, for her part, treats one of the boys like a girl. She calls him by a girl's name, dresses her in female clothes and sends him to a school for girls. The family court gave the mother authority over the medical and psychological care of the children, and excluded the father's opinion. Due to public outcry, the judge backed down on the primary decision [in fact it was the jury's decision] and now gives the father equal rights.
Much of the controversy had centered on the transgender aspect of this court case. I want us to pay attention to the power of the family courts,
to the control of the life of this honest father.
In the court documents on this case , we find the mother's "wish list". She requests that the father refrain from cutting the child's hair, not using the "wrong" pronoun, or calling him by the "wrong" name. At this point, the mother wanted the father to be compelled not to approach within 500 feet of the children's school. The mother said that there is a risk that the father comes to a school event and presents
the boy as a boy to those who know him as a girl.
The transgender aspect of this court case is built on the laws of divorce. The courts have long had this authority over the lives of honest parents. Family courts control the details of family life, including their finances, how children spend their time, what school they go to, and, yes, even their haircuts.
Family courts are perfect examples of a strong administrative state, because they are accountable to no one and often their proceedings are conducted in secret. Trial judge Younger imposed a silence order on the parents, which prevents them from speaking to the media until their children reach 18 years of age. In fact, the documents mentioned above can be found on a site called www.gagthis.org, created by friends of the father.
Marini declares that the administrative state deprives citizens of autonomy and deposits it in the hands of experts. Family courts and surrounding administrative systems declare that their decisions are made "in the best interests of the child." The truth is that the "best interest of the child" is that he lives all his life with both parents in a union of love and fidelity.
Many people believe that "faultless divorce" means the same thing as "divorce by mutual consent", but this is by no means the case. Our divorce regime is unilateral, so anyone who wants a divorce can get it. The state still supports the party that wants marriage less. The state encourages disloyalty and infidelity between spouses and if things go wrong, the state allows itself to clean up the mess.
The injustices of the unilateral divorce regime have been known for a very long time. The Deep State could at any time make divorce possible only by mutual consent, but do not. The most reasonable explanation: they like the system as it is.
David Daleiden: The Deep State is beating around the bush on abortion.
David Daleiden and Sandra Meritt are underground journalists who secretly recorded employees of Planned Parenthood , who were discussing sales of pieces of aborted babies. These journalists believed they were "investigating violent crimes committed against children born alive at Planned Parenthood facilities . "
Planned Parenthood therefore filed a civil lawsuit, alleging that Daleiden and his team had made illegal recordings, trespassing,
breaches of confidentiality and much more.
An analyst said that Planned Parenthood attorneys must be vigilant to "prove that Daleiden and his team illegally recorded the conversations,
but did not disclose the subject of the conversations. "
Planned Parenthood won its civil lawsuit with the help of a cooperative judge. Federal district judge William Orrick lll has ties to Planned Parenthood . He served as secretary and lawyer for one of their affiliates, and his wife made several public statements against the defendants. He did not recuse himself, and the Ninth Circuit of the Court of Appeal did not compel him to do so.
Orrick steered the trial in a direction other than that determined by the First Amendment (freedom of speech) and that of freedom of the media, which are normally at stake in a trial involving investigative journalism. He withdrew the testimony and evidence that drew attention to the "exact subject of the conversations" and refused to show most of the videos to the jury. He instructed the jury to find the accused guilty of trespassing.
The only real question for the jury was to determine the amount of compensation.
This trial is the concrete example of all the elements of the deep state which collaborates together. The fact that abortion is illegal is not satisfactory for the deep state. The abortion industry must be beyond criticism. Why ? Because, despite their continual claims to the contrary, abortion is not just "another medical procedure. If this were the case, the abortion industry and its supporters would not oppose health and safety regulations.
The ruling elites would also not object to the investigation of possible crimes in the abortion industry.
Abortion must be protected, as it is the ultimate guarantor of sterile sexual activity. Everyone who is old enough to give consent has the right to have unlimited, trouble-free, guilt-free and worry-free sex. If an abortion has serious side effects, even if it only happens to certain people, publicizing this fact undermines the "right" to sex. If the abortion industry is denounced for targeting only its own financial gain and is not reliable,
then this too undermines the belief that every unwelcome conception can always be eliminated.
This is why keeping safe, legal and rare abortion has never been enough.
This brings us to the personal interests of the elite classes. Delaying motherhood has become the cost of entering professional fields. In other words, most successful, influential and visible people have used contraception or abortion and cannot imagine life without these remedies. Journalists, lawyers, foundation leaders, business leaders and politicians are joining forces to protect the abortion industry from skeptics like David Daleiden. The abortion industry also makes a lot of money, including millions from the taxpayer.
Jeffrey Epstein: tie it all together
The recent arrest and "suicide" of Jeffrey Epstein brings together all the important elements of the deep sexual state.
As we all know, Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of sexually assaulting minors and vulnerable young women during his lifetime. He provided these young girls and women with potentates that we find in the upper echelons of society, both governmental and academic. We can be fairly certain that senior media leaders have covered the story . Epstein implemented methods of blackmailing these men while they exploited the victims. The elites of several sectors were plotting against the weak. How was this possible beyond the use of raw power?
Victim statements tell us that he targeted young girls without fathers and those who lived with foster families. This is a revealing fact. A fatherless damsel is an easy target for predators, as fathers are figures of natural authority. The ideology of "feminism" today describes all men as possible predators and who should not be trusted. This takes away the legitimacy of fathers in their roles of parental authority. Between psychological reframing and hideous public policies, fathers were systematically removed from their homes, especially among the poorest and most vulnerable. Its functions are now exercised by the State and its civil servants or not at all.
This dynamic has parallels throughout our society.
Police authorities are constantly weakened and the police are constantly being stripped of their legitimacy. Spreading the distrust of the legally constituted police authorities creates nothing in public security. With the tacit approval of the elected officials, a crowd of paid agitators filled this void. People like anti-fascists are not beholden to any legitimate authority other than those who pay them and allow them to act with impunity. Angelo Codevilla observed that the violence of anti-fascists only becomes a problem when the fathers of the city [the authority] allow it. Without the protection of local elected representatives, “the number of anti-fascists and their capacity for destruction are no match for ordinary police forces or armed citizens. "
The Sexual Revolution creates and encourages the ideology of selfishness which conveys an unmistakable message saying that everyone has the right to do what they can if they don't get caught. Prosecutors said Epstein had three US passports and owned several planes and homes around the world, including on his private island. Witnesses and victims feared the blackmail and revenge of Epstein, he is the kind of man who can get away with it.
The ideology of the deep sexual state relieves people of their stubborn conscience. Epstein had a malformed conscience, to put it mildly. In 2011, he told the New York Post, “I am not a predator, I am an“ offender ”. This is the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel. He is said to have once claimed to have received three 12-year-old girls as a birthday present. No ideology should justify the actions of a man like him,
but the Sexual Revolution provides such excuses.
#SaveJames: James Younger and the anarchy of family courts.
A divorced father living in Texas wants to raise his two sons as a boy. The mother, for her part, treats one of the boys like a girl. She calls him by a girl's name, dresses her in female clothes and sends him to a school for girls. The family court gave the mother authority over the medical and psychological care of the children, and excluded the father's opinion. Due to public outcry, the judge backed down on the primary decision [in fact it was the jury's decision] and now gives the father equal rights.
Much of the controversy had centered on the transgender aspect of this court case. I want us to pay attention to the power of the family courts,
to the control of the life of this honest father.
In the court documents on this case , we find the mother's "wish list". She requests that the father refrain from cutting the child's hair, not using the "wrong" pronoun, or calling him by the "wrong" name. At this point, the mother wanted the father to be compelled not to approach within 500 feet of the children's school. The mother said that there is a risk that the father comes to a school event and presents
the boy as a boy to those who know him as a girl.
The transgender aspect of this court case is built on the laws of divorce. The courts have long had this authority over the lives of honest parents. Family courts control the details of family life, including their finances, how children spend their time, what school they go to, and, yes, even their haircuts.
Family courts are perfect examples of a strong administrative state, because they are accountable to no one and often their proceedings are conducted in secret. Trial judge Younger imposed a silence order on the parents, which prevents them from speaking to the media until their children reach 18 years of age. In fact, the documents mentioned above can be found on a site called www.gagthis.org, created by friends of the father.
Marini declares that the administrative state deprives citizens of autonomy and deposits it in the hands of experts. Family courts and surrounding administrative systems declare that their decisions are made "in the best interests of the child." The truth is that the "best interest of the child" is that he lives all his life with both parents in a union of love and fidelity.
Many people believe that "faultless divorce" means the same thing as "divorce by mutual consent", but this is by no means the case. Our divorce regime is unilateral, so anyone who wants a divorce can get it. The state still supports the party that wants marriage less. The state encourages disloyalty and infidelity between spouses and if things go wrong, the state allows itself to clean up the mess.
The injustices of the unilateral divorce regime have been known for a very long time. The Deep State could at any time make divorce possible only by mutual consent, but do not. The most reasonable explanation: they like the system as it is.
David Daleiden: The Deep State is beating around the bush on abortion.
David Daleiden and Sandra Meritt are underground journalists who secretly recorded employees of Planned Parenthood , who were discussing sales of pieces of aborted babies. These journalists believed they were "investigating violent crimes committed against children born alive at Planned Parenthood facilities . "
Planned Parenthood therefore filed a civil lawsuit, alleging that Daleiden and his team had made illegal recordings, trespassing,
breaches of confidentiality and much more.
An analyst said that Planned Parenthood attorneys must be vigilant to "prove that Daleiden and his team illegally recorded the conversations,
but did not disclose the subject of the conversations. "
Planned Parenthood won its civil lawsuit with the help of a cooperative judge. Federal district judge William Orrick lll has ties to Planned Parenthood . He served as secretary and lawyer for one of their affiliates, and his wife made several public statements against the defendants. He did not recuse himself, and the Ninth Circuit of the Court of Appeal did not compel him to do so.
Orrick steered the trial in a direction other than that determined by the First Amendment (freedom of speech) and that of freedom of the media, which are normally at stake in a trial involving investigative journalism. He withdrew the testimony and evidence that drew attention to the "exact subject of the conversations" and refused to show most of the videos to the jury. He instructed the jury to find the accused guilty of trespassing.
The only real question for the jury was to determine the amount of compensation.
This trial is the concrete example of all the elements of the deep state which collaborates together. The fact that abortion is illegal is not satisfactory for the deep state. The abortion industry must be beyond criticism. Why ? Because, despite their continual claims to the contrary, abortion is not just "another medical procedure. If this were the case, the abortion industry and its supporters would not oppose health and safety regulations.
The ruling elites would also not object to the investigation of possible crimes in the abortion industry.
Abortion must be protected, as it is the ultimate guarantor of sterile sexual activity. Everyone who is old enough to give consent has the right to have unlimited, trouble-free, guilt-free and worry-free sex. If an abortion has serious side effects, even if it only happens to certain people, publicizing this fact undermines the "right" to sex. If the abortion industry is denounced for targeting only its own financial gain and is not reliable,
then this too undermines the belief that every unwelcome conception can always be eliminated.
This is why keeping safe, legal and rare abortion has never been enough.
This brings us to the personal interests of the elite classes. Delaying motherhood has become the cost of entering professional fields. In other words, most successful, influential and visible people have used contraception or abortion and cannot imagine life without these remedies. Journalists, lawyers, foundation leaders, business leaders and politicians are joining forces to protect the abortion industry from skeptics like David Daleiden. The abortion industry also makes a lot of money, including millions from the taxpayer.
Jeffrey Epstein: tie it all together
The recent arrest and "suicide" of Jeffrey Epstein brings together all the important elements of the deep sexual state.
As we all know, Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of sexually assaulting minors and vulnerable young women during his lifetime. He provided these young girls and women with potentates that we find in the upper echelons of society, both governmental and academic. We can be fairly certain that senior media leaders have covered the story . Epstein implemented methods of blackmailing these men while they exploited the victims. The elites of several sectors were plotting against the weak. How was this possible beyond the use of raw power?
Victim statements tell us that he targeted young girls without fathers and those who lived with foster families. This is a revealing fact. A fatherless damsel is an easy target for predators, as fathers are figures of natural authority. The ideology of "feminism" today describes all men as possible predators and who should not be trusted. This takes away the legitimacy of fathers in their roles of parental authority. Between psychological reframing and hideous public policies, fathers were systematically removed from their homes, especially among the poorest and most vulnerable. Its functions are now exercised by the State and its civil servants or not at all.
This dynamic has parallels throughout our society.
Police authorities are constantly weakened and the police are constantly being stripped of their legitimacy. Spreading the distrust of the legally constituted police authorities creates nothing in public security. With the tacit approval of the elected officials, a crowd of paid agitators filled this void. People like anti-fascists are not beholden to any legitimate authority other than those who pay them and allow them to act with impunity. Angelo Codevilla observed that the violence of anti-fascists only becomes a problem when the fathers of the city [the authority] allow it. Without the protection of local elected representatives, “the number of anti-fascists and their capacity for destruction are no match for ordinary police forces or armed citizens. "
The Sexual Revolution creates and encourages the ideology of selfishness which conveys an unmistakable message saying that everyone has the right to do what they can if they don't get caught. Prosecutors said Epstein had three US passports and owned several planes and homes around the world, including on his private island. Witnesses and victims feared the blackmail and revenge of Epstein, he is the kind of man who can get away with it.
The ideology of the deep sexual state relieves people of their stubborn conscience. Epstein had a malformed conscience, to put it mildly. In 2011, he told the New York Post, “I am not a predator, I am an“ offender ”. This is the difference between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel. He is said to have once claimed to have received three 12-year-old girls as a birthday present. No ideology should justify the actions of a man like him,
but the Sexual Revolution provides such excuses.
Conclusion
Several other examples can be found in my book The Deep Sexual State .
The Sexual Revolution was a coup. That's why I capitalize the term "Sexual Revolution." Whatever the opinions of others, we must give it the historical dignity that it deserves [I would give it the indignity it deserves *]. The Sexual Revolution, in all its aspects, was as important in the reshaping of society as the French Revolution or the Bolshevik Revolution [idem *].
The "social conservatives" are not those who try to "impose their moral values" on a refractory society. Sex revolutionaries apply their morals to our citizens with impunity. "Social problems" are not sweet, delicate and unworthy of intellectual thinkers. Compromising and replacing the natural family diet is a serious matter, including undermining everything that traditional America and the conservative spirit claims to be important,
such as fiscal responsibility, the limits of government power and the rule of law. reason itself.
Here is why delegating its "social problems" to the margins is a big mistake for the future of a free society. The deep sexual state must be seen for what it is: an essential part of the ideology of the current political class and of the tyrannical administrative state.
Several other examples can be found in my book The Deep Sexual State .
The Sexual Revolution was a coup. That's why I capitalize the term "Sexual Revolution." Whatever the opinions of others, we must give it the historical dignity that it deserves [I would give it the indignity it deserves *]. The Sexual Revolution, in all its aspects, was as important in the reshaping of society as the French Revolution or the Bolshevik Revolution [idem *].
The "social conservatives" are not those who try to "impose their moral values" on a refractory society. Sex revolutionaries apply their morals to our citizens with impunity. "Social problems" are not sweet, delicate and unworthy of intellectual thinkers. Compromising and replacing the natural family diet is a serious matter, including undermining everything that traditional America and the conservative spirit claims to be important,
such as fiscal responsibility, the limits of government power and the rule of law. reason itself.
Here is why delegating its "social problems" to the margins is a big mistake for the future of a free society. The deep sexual state must be seen for what it is: an essential part of the ideology of the current political class and of the tyrannical administrative state.